黑料吃瓜网

Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 16 no. 1 (2023)

Determining the Distance Learning Educational Atmosphere Factors on the Attitude Toward Mathematics Teaching-Learning Processes During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Hybrid SEM-ANN

Aarhus Dela Cruz

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to identify the factors of the distance learning educational atmosphere that influence the attitude towards mathematics teaching-learning processes of the students in the Schools Division of City of Malolos for the school year 2020-2021. It used a quantitative approach, specifically a causal research design through a two-stage analysis in investigating the influence of distance learning educational atmosphere on the attitude towards mathematics teaching-learning processes. The results showed that the distance learning educational atmosphere had a positive influence on self-esteem and attitude toward mathematics teaching-learning processes. Furthermore, self-esteem was found to mediate the relationship between distance learning educational atmosphere and attitude towards mathematics teaching-learning processes. The study also revealed that ethics and professionalism is the most important factor in teacher presentation of content, program effectiveness for interest towards mathematics, and teaching quality as the potent value of mathematics. Finally, this study suggests that adequate resources and support may be provided to mathematics teachers in a distance learning educational atmosphere to improve the attitude of the students toward mathematics teaching-learning processes.



References:

  1. Abramson, A. (2021). Capturing the benefits of remote learning. https://www.apa.org. 
  2. Akin, I., & Radford, L. (2018). Exploring The Development of Student Self-Esteem And Resilience In Urban Schools. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 11(1), 17–24. 
  3. Allen, J. P., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., Lun, J., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2013). Observations of Effective Teacher–Student Interactions in Secondary School Classrooms: Predicting Student Achievement with the Classroom Assessment Scoring System—Secondary. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76–98. 
  4. Arcilla, J. (2020). DepEd releases simplified curriculum. The Manila Times. Retrieved September 13, 2020, from
  5. Babbie, E. R. (2020). The practice of social research. Cengage learning.
  6. Basar, Z. M., Mansor, A. N., Jamaludin, K. A., & Alias, B. S. (2021). The Effectiveness and Challenges of online learning for secondary school students – a case study. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(3), 119. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i3.14514
  7. Boaler, J., Munson, J., & Williams, C. (2018). Mindset Mathematics: Visualizing and Investigating Big Ideas, Grade 3. John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Bringula, R. P., Reguyal, J. J., Tan, D., & Ulfa, S. (2021). Mathematics self-concept and challenges of learners in an online learning environment during COVID-19 pandemic. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1). 
  9. Bueno, A., & Pacis, J. (2020). As COVID-19 forces life to move online, who is left behind? CNN Philippines. Retrieved September 13, 2020, from
  10. Capuno, R., Necesario, R., Etcuban, J. O., Espina, R., Padillo, G., & Manguilimotan, R. (2019). Attitudes, Study Habits, and Academic Performance of Junior High School Students in Mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 547-561.
  11. Conner, M. (2020). Theory of planned behavior. Handbook of sport psychology, 1-18.
  12. Dabney, K. P., Tai, R. H., Almarode, J., Miller-Friedmann, J., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Hazari, Z. (2012). Out-of-School Time Science Activities and Their Association with Career Interest in STEM. International Journal of Science Education, 2(1), 63–79. 
  13. Davadas, S. D., & Lay, Y. F. (2017). Factors Affecting Students’ Attitude toward Mathematics: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1). 
  14. Department of Education. (2020a). DepEd Order No. 012, s. 2020: Adoption of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan for School Year 2020-2021 in Light of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency.
  15. Department of Education. (2020b). DepEd prepared Self-Learning Modules for education’s new normal.
  16. Department of Science and Technology, Republic of the Philippines. (2020). PH ranks 50th among 131 economies in the Global Innovation Index 2020. Retrieved September 13, 2020 from
  17. Dixon, F. A., Yssel, N., McConnell, J. J., & Hardin, T. (2014). Differentiated Instruction, Professional Development, and Teacher Efficacy. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(2), 111–127. 
  18. Eriksson, K., Helenius, O., & Ryve, A. (2019). Using TIMSS items to evaluate the effectiveness of different instructional practices. Instructional Science, 47(1), 1–18. 
  19. Fabian, K., Topping, K. J., & Barron, I. G. (2016). Mobile technology and mathematics: Effects on students’ attitudes, engagement, and achievement. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(1), 77-104.
  20. Golding, J., & Grima, G. (2021). A pandemic summer: Impact on teaching and learning for mastery in Power Maths primary schools. In: Marks, R, (Ed.) BSRLM Proceedings.   BSRLM (2021).
  21. Gray-Little, B., Williams, V. S. L., & Hancock, T. D. (1997). An item response theory analysis of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 443-451.
  22. Hwang, G., Wang, S., & Lai, C. (2021). Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics. Computers & Education, 160, 104031. 
  23. Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2018). Activity Theory as a Framework for Human-Technology Interaction Research, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 25:1, 3-5.
  24. Kim, H. S., Hong, A. J., & Song, H. (2019). The roles of academic engagement and digital readiness in students’ achievements in university e-learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). 
  25. Kline, R. B. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. In The SAGE handbook of innovation in social research methods (pp. 562-589). SAGE Publications Ltd,
  26. Korolkov, A., Germanov, G., Langueva, O., Shevyakova, A. A., & Poskrebysheva, N. N. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of distance learning on students’ and teachers’ of the physical culture faculty opinion. BIO Web of Conferences, 26, 00058. 
  27. Krittanawong, C., Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Aydar, M., & Kitai, T. (2017). Artificial intelligence in precision cardiovascular medicine. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 69(21), 2657-2664.
  28. Lapid, M. (2020). SENATE S. No. 3220 Explanatory Note: Introduced by Senator Manuel “Lito” M. Lapid. Fifteenth Congress of the Republic of the Philippines: Second Regular Session.
  29. León, J., Medina-Garrido, E., & Núñez, J. L. (2017). Teaching Quality in Math Class: The Development of a Scale and the Analysis of Its Relationship with Engagement and Achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00895
  30. Lin, Y. W., Tseng, C. L., & Chiang, P. J. (2016). The effect of blended learning in mathematics course. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 741-770.
  31. Marbán, J. M., Radwan, E., Radwan, A., & Radwan, W. (2021). Primary and Secondary Students’ Usage of Digital Platforms for Mathematics Learning during the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Case of the Gaza Strip. Mathematics, 9(2), 110.
  32. Minnick, D.R. (1989). A Guide to Creating Self-Learning Materials. International Rice Research Institute. Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.
  33. Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, P., & Alonso-García, S. (2020). E-learning in the teaching of mathematics: an educational experience in adult high school. Mathematics, 8(5), 840.
  34. Mousavi, A., Mohammadi, A., Mojtahedzadeh, R., Shirazi, M., & Rashidi, H. (2020). E-learning educational atmosphere measure (EEAM): a new instrument for assessing e-students’ perception of educational environment. Research in Learning Technology, 28(0).
  35. Mutohir, T.C., Lowrie, T., & Patahuddin, S.M. (2018). The Development of a Student Survey on Attitudes towards Mathematics Teaching-Learning Processes. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 1-14.
  36. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.
  37. Nsengimana, T., Bazimaziki, G., Nyirahabimana, A., Mushimiyimana, J. B., Mutarutinya, V., Mugabo, L. R., & Nsengimana, V. (2021). Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic in Rwanda: Experience of Postgraduate Students on Language of Instruction, Mathematics and Science Education. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 2(1), ep21009. 
  38. Oginni, O. I., Akinola, A. S., Fadiji, A. E., & Amole, P. T. (2021). Effects of Mastery Learning Strategy on Secondary School Students Performance in Mathematics. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 2(5), 59–63. 
  39. Pellas, N. (2014). The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of Second Life. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 157–170. 
  40. Pereira, L., & Gomes, S. (2022). The Impact of Distance Learning on the Teaching-Learning Process of Mathematics in Higher Technical Education. Journal of Educators Online, 19. 
  41. Phan, H. P., & Ngu, B. H. (2018). An examination of social and psychological influences on academic learning: A focus on self-esteem, social relationships, and personal interest. Social Psychology of Education, 21(1), 51-73.
  42. Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A Literature Review on Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Teaching and Learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133–141. 
  43. Rameli, M. R. M., Alhassora, N. S. A., Bunyamin, M. a. H., & Hanri, C. (2020). Student Teachers’ Attitude and Self-esteem towards Online Learning: Application of Rasch Measurement Model. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11C), 37–44. 
  44. Rohmadi, K. D., & Indriani, L. (2020). An Analysis of Students’ Inhibition Level on Synchronous Class Using Video Conferencing. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 3(2), 349–357. 
  45. Ronquillo, M. (2020). What will happen to 5,000 public schools without electricity? The Manila Times. Retrieved September 13, 2020 from
  46. Subia, G. S., Salangsang, L. G., & Medrano, H. B. (2018). Attitude and performance in mathematics I of bachelor of elementary education students: A correlational analysis. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS), 39(1), 206-213.
  47. Supple, A. J., Su, J., Plunkett, S. W., Peterson, G. W., & Bush, K. R. (2013). Factor structure of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(5), 748-764.
  48. Thakkar, J. J. (2020). Structural Equation Modelling: Application for Research and Practice (with AMOS and R) (Vol. 285). Springer Nature.
  49. Vakoufari, M., Christina, A., & Mavroidis, I. (2014). Self-Esteem and Loneliness as Factors Affecting Distance Learning Students. The European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 17(2), 100–116. 
  50. Vandecandelaere, M., Speybroeck, S., Vanlaar, G., De Fraine, B., & Van Damme, J. (2012). Learning environment and students’ mathematics attitude. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(3-4), 107-120.
  51. Videla, R., Rossel, S., Muñoz, C., & Aguayo, C. (2022). Online Mathematics Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Didactic Strategies, Educational Resources, and Educational Contexts. Education Sciences, 12(7), 492. 
  52. Vl膬descu, C. (2022). Mastery Learning and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Teaching and Learning Mathematics in Romanian Schools. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 7(2), 2-23.
  53. Wasserman, E., & Migdal, R. (2019). Professional Development- Differences in teachers’ attitudes between online and traditional training courses. Online Learning, 23(1). 
  54. Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educational and psychological measurement, 76(6), 913–934.
  55. Xie, F., Xin, Z., Chen, X., & Zhang, L. (2019). Gender difference of Chinese high school students’ math anxiety: The effects of self-esteem, test anxiety and general anxiety. Sex Roles, 81(3), 235-244.
  56. Yuanita, P., Zulnaidi, H., & Zakaria, E. (2018). The effectiveness of Realistic Mathematics Education approach: The role of mathematical representation as mediator between mathematical belief and problem solving. PLOS ONE, 13(9), e0204847. 
  57. Yuliani, R. E., Suryadi, D., & Dahlan, J. A. (2019). Analysis of mathematics anxiety of junior high school students. Journal of Physics, 1157, 042053. 
  58. Zaman, S., & Nashmena, H. (2021). IMPACT OF ONLINE EDUCATION ON STUDENT’S SATISFACTION AND SELFCONFIDENCE ON LEARNING DURING COVID -19 IN PAKISTAN. Pakistan Journal of Educational Research, 4(3). .
  59. Zikmund, W. G., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2012). Business Research Methods (with Qualtrics Printed Access Card). South-Western Pub.

Tools


Copyright © 2025   黑料吃瓜网