ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 2 (2025)

Political Cynicism and Political Participation of Voters in Negros Oriental, Philippines

Eden Grace V. Tabanao

Discipline: Politics

 

Abstract:

This study was designed to examine political cynicism, political participation, and their interrelationship among voters in Negros Oriental, Philippines. An overall population of 400 registered voters participated in this study. The respondents’ skepticism or belief was that politicians were motivated or characterized purely by self-interest, dishonesty, untrustworthiness, being out-of-touch, incompetence, and immorality. There were two indicators of political participation: the first indicator of political participation was electoral, and the second was political voice. The first, electoral activity, “voting during elections” was highly prioritized by the respondents, having a 1.79 weighted mean. The second indicator of political participation was political voice. This indicator had a low priority to voters, with an aggregate mean of only 0.46, whose verbal description was ‘not applicable.’ There was an inverse relationship between the two factors investigated in this study. With elevated perceptions of political cynicism, marked by beliefs in dishonesty, incompetence, and detachment from the public, political engagement declined, especially in non-electoral activities. High political cynicism hurts participation and constitutes an important area of relationship with implications for political theory and practice. Measures like transparency and accountability will promote the people's involvement in more extensive issues since such policies will help restore confidence and reduce cynicism. Therefore, Policies are important, promoting ethical behavior amongst politicians to rebuild trust and evoke a more participating citizenry.



References:

  1. Adriaansen, M. L., Praag. P. V., & de Vreese, C. H. (2010). Substance Matters: How News Content can Reduce Political Cynicism. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(4), 433–457.
  2. Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Karp, J. A. (2007). Enraged or Engaged? Preferences for Direct Citizen Participation in Affluent Democracies. Political Research Quarterly, 60(3), 351-362.
  3. Brady, H. E. (1999). Political participation. Measures of political attitudes, 2, 737-801.
  4. Cappella, J. , & Jamieson, K. H. (2023). Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good Retrieved from
  5. Carroll, S. J. (2014). Voting Choices: How and Why the Gender Gap Matters. In S. J. Carroll, & R. L. Fox (Eds.), Gender & Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics (pp. 119-145). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Chaloupka, W. (1999). Everybody Knows, Cynicism in America. Retrieved from
  7. Citrin, J. (1974). Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 973–988.
  8. Dahl, R.A. (1971). Polyarchy; Participation and Opposition. Retrieved from
  9. Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Retrieved from 
  10. De Vreese, C. (2004). The Effects of Strategic News on Political Cynicism, Issue Evaluations, and Policy Support: A Two-Wave Experiment. Mass Communication and Society, 7(2), 191–214.
  11. Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley
  12. Hollnsteiner, M. (1962). The lowland Philippine alliance system in municipal politics. Philippine Sociological Review, 10, 167-171.
  13. Lande, C. (1968). Party politics in the Philippines. In Guthrie, G. M. (Ed.), Six perspectives on the Philippines (pp. 85-131).
  14. McDermott, M. L., Schwartz, D., & Vallejo, S. (2015). Talking the talk but not walking the walk: Public reactions to hypocrisy in political scandal. American Politics Research, 43, 952–974.
  15. Milbrath, L.W. (1981). Political Participation. In: Long, S.L. (eds) The Handbook of Political Behavior. Springer, Boston, MA.
  16. Miller, W.E., & Stokes, D.E. (1963). Constituency Influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57, 45-56.
  17. Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Pederson, R. T. (2012). The Game Frame and Political Efficacy: Beyond the Spiral of Cynicism. European Journal of Communication, 27(3), 225-240.
  19. Pinkleton, B. E., & Austin, E. W. (2002). Exploring Relationships among Media Use Frequency, Perceived Media Importance, and Media Satisfaction in Political Disaffection and Efficacy. Mass Communication & Society, 5, 141-163.
  20. Rijkhoff, S. A. M., & Travis, N. R., (2013). Your Lying, Incompetent and Selfish Member of Congress: Cynical Appeals in U.S. Senate Advertising. Retrieved from 
  21. Schaffer, K. (2002). Stolen Generation Narratives in Local and Global Contexts. Antipodes, 16(1), 1.
  22. Shu, G. F. (2012). Sweeping dishonesty under the rug: How unethical actions lead to forgetting of moral rules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1164-1177.
  23. Sicat, L. M. (1970). The political attitudes of young Filipinos: A study in political socialization (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  24. Sicat, L.M. (1976). Political socialization in the Philippines today: An empirical study. Philippine Political Science Journal, 3, 112-134.
  25. Uhlaner, J. N. (2015). Politics and Participation. Retrieved from  .
  26. Vreese, D., Claes, H., & Holli, A. S. (2002). Cynical and Engaged: Strategic Campaign Coverage, Public Opinion, and Mobilization in a Referendum. Communication Research, 29, 615-641.

Tools


Copyright © 2025   ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø