Adapting Information Literacy Programs Across Learning Modalities: A Case Study from the University Library, UP Diliman
Marzo Meco B. Alfonso | Michelle Anne S. de Leon | Alessandra A. Guimba | Martian A. Jinio | Nikko Angelo D. Lastimosa | Eunice Ann Y. Chua | A.B. Gideon N. De Castro | Mark Xavier G. Dumlao | Ma. Christine G. Hernandez | Jessica M. Tumlos
Abstract:
Purpose/Objectives. The case study aims to explore and analyze the key characteristics of varying learning modalities encountered by designing and implementing information literacy (IL) initiatives for the academic community. Considering the evident learning modalities, the researchers intend to distinguish the inherent challenge/s each presents, identify the key competencies and skill sets employed to address these challenges, and recommend a long-term operational solution.
Significance of the study. This study provides valuable insights into the information literacy initiatives at the University Library Diliman. The findings offer essential perspectives for librarians, educators, and stakeholders seeking to enhance IL programs in higher education. By examining the challenges faced, key competencies involved, and solutions implemented, the study showcases the dynamic evolution of IL in academic libraries and the changing roles of librarians.
Design, methodology, approach. A qualitative approach was employed to gain a detailed understanding of the attributes and challenges associated with various learning modalities. Four librarians were purposively selected based on their active involvement in managing IL initiatives within these modalities. Semi-structured face-to-face, audio-recorded interviews were conducted with participants’ consent to ensure accurate transcription and analysis. Thematic analysis was then used to code the qualitative data collected from the interviews, identifying recurring themes and patterns related to the research objectives.
Results and discussions. Insights from interviews with four (4) librarians involved in developing IL programs across various learning modalities reveal that a dedicated team structure enhances program effectiveness through diverse expertise and roles of its members. Key challenges in the design and implementation of IL initiatives during each learning modality were identified. The findings highlighted the importance of adaptability, resilience, and continuous professional development in overcoming these challenges in order to deliver impactful IL initiatives.
Research limitations and implication. The findings reflect the experiences of librarians from this university. Additionally, the various modalities explored—Face-to-Face, Distance Education, Blended Learning, and Transition—were specifically grounded in the university’s policies. As such, these may not be fully applicable or representative of the perspectives of librarians at other academic libraries in the Philippines.
Originality of the paper. The focus of this study on adapting to various learning modalities during rapid changes, alongside an exploration of key competencies and strategies, offers unique insights into sustaining literacy initiatives in academic settings during the new normal.
References:
- Adams, J. (2024). Examining ethical and social implications of digital mental health technologies through expert interviews and sociotechnical systems theory. Digital Society 3, 24.
- ALA Literacy Clearinghouse. (n.d.). Information Literacy.
- Aslam, M. (2022). Adapting to change in academic libraries. Global Knowledge, Memory, and Communication, 71(8/9). 672-685.
- Association of College & Research Libraries. (2015). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education.
- Ateneo de Manila University Library (2022). Media and information literacy. Information literacy Program: surviving in the information age.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
- Cao, X., Xu, C. and Ali, A. (2024). A socio-technical system perspective to exploring the negative effects of social media on work performance. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 76(2), 233-247.
- Cherinet, Y. M. (2018). Blended skills and future roles of librarians. Library Management, 39, 1/2, 93-105.
- Chua, E. A. Y., & Jinio, M. A. (2023). The Great InfoHunt: A narrative analysis of the UP Diliman’s first library gamification activity. In Proceedings of the 2023 Asia Pacific Library and Information Education and Practice (pp. 302–312).
- De La Salle University Libraries. (2022). IamInfosmart 2022 - mileage: Towards lifelong learning and Sustainability - day 2. IamInfoSMART 2022.
- Enakrire, R.T. (2024). The use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) by librarians for information and knowledge management in academic institutions in the fourth industrial revolution. In Ocholla, D., Onyancha, O.B., Adesina, A.O. (eds.). Information, Knowledge and Technology for Teaching and Research in Africa. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval and Services. Springer.
- Gedera, D., Forbes, D., Brown, C., Hartnett, M., and Datt, A. (2023). Learning during a pandemic: an Activity Theory analysis of the challenges experienced by Aotearoa/New Zealand university students. Education Technology Research and Development, 71, 2271-2295.
- Goggins, S., Laffey, J., and Gallagher, M. (2011). Completely online group formation and development: small groups as socio-technical systems. Information Technology & People, 24(2), 104-133.
- Goodwin, A., & Afzal, W. 2023. Giving voice to regional Australian academic librarians: Perceptions of information literacy and information literacy instruction. Journal of Information Literacy, 17(2), pp. 131–149.
- Govers, M., and van Amelsvoort, P.A. (2023). A theoretical essay on sociotechnical systems design thinking in the era of digital transformation. Gruppe Interaktion Organization, 54, 27-40.
- Ntara, C. (2023). Sociotechnical Systems Theory & Characteristics | What is the STS Theory?. Study.com.
- Okwu, E., and Opurum, A. (2021). Inadequate library services: a challenge to 21st century education in a developing economy. British Journal of Library and Information Management, 1(1). 39-44.
- Olsen, R., & Harlow, S. (2022). Creating library tutorials to provide flexibility and customized learning in asynchronous settings. Public Services Quarterly, 18(1), 19–33.
- Ortega-Martínez, E. de los A., Saavedra-Alamillas, C., Rosendahl, M., & Sánchez-Hernández, A. (2022). Technical practices used by information literacy and media information literacy services to enable academic libraries to handle the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Information Literacy, 16(1).
- Owusu, A. (2024). Knowledge management systems implementation effects on university students’ academic performance: the socio-technical theory perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 4417-4442.
- Oyedum, G., and Nwalo, K. (2011). Perceptions by undergraduate students of the environmental conditions and resources availability in selected university libraries in Nigeria. African Journal of Library, Archives, and Information Science, 21(1), 73+. Gale Academic OneFile.
- Philippine Librarianship (Republic Act No. 9246) Act, 2003.
- Philipps, J., Pitts, L., Riedmueller, J., & Warren, J. (2024). Keeping the light on: academic librarians and burnout. The Southeastern Librarian, 72(1). 5-11.
- Pryor, G. (Eds.). (2012). Managing research data. London: Facet Publishing.
- Reitz, J. (2004). Dictionary for Library and Information Science. Libraries Unlimited.
- Siddike, A.K. (2012). Users’ perceptions regarding networking and resource sharing in selected academic libraries of Bangladesh. Library Philosophy and Practice. Gale Academic OneFile.
- University of the Philippines. Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs. (2022, June 20). OVPAA Memorandum No. 2022-88.
- University of the Philippines Diliman. The University Library. (2020, October 8). Rediscovering Your Library in the New Normal: Information Literacy Webinar for Students.
- Zheng, W., Yang, B., & McLean G.N. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 63. 763-771.
ISSN 2423-2254 (Online)
ISSN 2423-1916 (Print)